½²×ùÌâÄ¿£ºZigzag reduplication in English
½² ×ù ÈË£ºJeroen van de Weijer, Shenzhen University
ʱ ¼ä£º2021Äê4ÔÂ16ÈÕ£¨ÖÜÎ壩14:00-16:00
µØ µã£ºSA105
½²×ùÈ˼ò½é£º
Ү³°²(Jeroen van de Weijer), ÓïÑÔѧ½ÌÊÚ£¬ºÉÀ¼»ÊÊҸ߼¶Ñо¿Ôº³ÉÔ±£¬×¨×¢Óھ䷨½á¹¹£¬ÓïÒôϵͳ£¬ÓïÑÔ±äÒ죬ÐÄÀíÓïÑÔѧÒÔ¼°ÓïÑÔÏ°µÃÑо¿¡£
1989 Äê±ÏÒµÓÚºÉÀ¼ÄÚ÷ºà´óѧÈÙÓþѧʿѧλ£¬Ë¶Ê¿ÆÚ¼äÁôѧÓÚÓ¢¹úÂ׶شóѧ£¬1994ÄêÓÚºÉÀ¼À³¶Ù´óѧ»ñµÃÓïÑÔѧ²©Ê¿Ñ§Î»¡£Ö®ºóÀ³¶Ù´óѧִ½ÌÊ®ÓàÄê¡£Æڼ䴴½¨ÁËÀ³¶Ù´óѧÓïÑÔѧѧÊõÑо¿ÐÍ˶ʿ°à£¬ÎüÒýÁËÖÚ¶à¹ú¼ÊѧÊõÈ˲ţ¬ÎªÀ³¶Ù´óѧµÄÓïÑÔѧרҵ½¨Éè×ö³öÁËÍ»³ö¹±Ïס£2009Äê9Ô£¬Ò®Â³°²ÊÜƸÓÚÖйúÉϺ£Íâ¹úÓï´óѧ£¬ÈÎÓïÑÔѧ½ÌÊÚ¡£2019Äê9Ô£¬Ò®Â³°²ÊÜƸÓÚÖйúÉîÛÚ´óѧ£¬ÈÎÓïÑÔѧÑо¿ÌØƸ½ÌÊÚ¡£
Ү³°²½ÌÊÚÖøÊö·á¸»£¬·¢±íµÄÖø×÷Éæ¼°ÓÅÑ¡ÂÛ¡¢ÈÕÓïÓïÑÔѧ¡¢ºÉÀ¼ÓïÓïÑÔѧ¡¢ÖйúÓïÑÔѧµÈÖî¶àÁìÓò£»±àÖøÁË¡¶ÓÅÑ¡ÂÛ£ºÒôϵ¡¢¾ä·¨ºÍÏ°µÃ¡·£¨2000Ä꣬ţ½ò´óѧ³ö°æÉ磩µÈ22²¿ÓïÑÔѧÖø×÷£¬³ö°æÓڵ¹úMouton de Gruyter¡¢ºÉÀ¼John BenjaminsµÈ¹ú¼ÊȨÍþ³ö°æÉ磻ÔÚLingua, Acta Linguistica, Linguistics, Journal of Chinese Linguistics, The Linguistic Review, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area,µÈÒ»Á÷ѧÊõÆÚ¿¯·¢±íѧÊõÂÛÎÄ35ƪ£»ÊÜÑûÓÚ29²¿ÓïÑÔѧÖø×÷ÖÐ׫дÏà¹ØÕ½ڣ¬ÆäÖÐ2001ÄêÖÁ2010ÄêÁ¬Ðø10ÄêΪţ½ò´óѧ³ö°æÉçµÄȨÍþ¿¯ÎïThe Year¡¯s Work in English Studies׫¸å£»23´ÎÊÜÑûÔÚ¹ú¼ÊÐÔѧÊõ»áÒéÉÏ×÷Ö÷½²¼Î±ö¡£ËûÓëÅ·Ö޺ͰüÀ¨Öйú¡¢ÈÕ±¾ºÍº«¹úµÈÑÇÖÞ¹ú¼ÒµÄµÄÓïÑÔѧÑо¿ÕßÓÐ×ų¤ÆÚ¶øÉîÔ¶µÄѧÊõºÏ×÷£¬¾ßÓÐÏ൱µÄѧÊõÖªÃû¶È£¬½ü5ÄêÂÛÎı»ÒýÓÃ400Óà´Î¡£Ä¿Ç°£¬Ò®Â³°²½ÌÊÚÖ¸µ¼Íê³É²©Ê¿ÂÛÎÄ18£¬ÆäÖÐÖйú12ÈË£¬ÊÜÑû²Î¼ÓÊÀ½ç¸÷µØ²©Ê¿ÂÛÎÄ´ð±ç32³¡£¬ÆäÖÐÖйú²©Ê¿Éú12³¡£¬Ö¸µ¼Ë¶Ê¿Ñо¿Éú53ÈË£¬ÆäÖÐÖйú˶ʿÑо¿Éú40ÈË¡£
Ү³°²½ÌÊÚÔÚ¹ú¼ÊѧÊõµÄƽ̨ÉÏ£¬¶ÔÖйúÓïÑÔѧÑо¿¼°È˲ÅÅàÑø¹±Ï×Í»³ö£¬³É¼¨ÏÔÖø¡£2010Äê³õ£¬Ò®Â³°²»ñµÃÓÉÉϺ£ÊнÌί°ä·¢µÄ¡±¶«·½Ñ§Õß¡±ÈÙÓþÖ¤Ê飬±»ÊÚÓè¡°ÌØƸ½ÌÊÚ¡±³ÆºÅ£¬²¢»ñµÃÏà¹Ø¿ÆÑлù½ð¡£2013Äê±»ÉϺ£ÊÐÕþ¸®ÊÚÓè¡°°×ÓñÀ¼¡±½±¡£2014Äê5ÔÂ22ÈÕ£¬ÓÉÓÚΪÍƶ¯ÎÒ¹úÖصãÁìÓò½¨ÉèÈ¡µÃ¿çԽʽ·¢Õ¹ºÍÖØ´ó¿ÆѧÑо¿È¡µÃ¹Ø¼üÐÔÍ»ÆÆ·¢»Ó×Å»ý¼«×÷Óã¬ÔÚÉϺ£Î÷½¼±ö¹ÝҮ³°²½ÌÊÚÓëÀ´×Ô22¸ö¹ú¼ÒµÄ50Ãûר¼ÒÒ»Æð£¬Êܵ½ÁËÏ°½üƽ×ÜÊé¼ÇµÄÇ×ÇнӼû¡£
½²×ùÄÚÈݼò½é£º
This presentation presents a new approach to words of the type zigzag, chitchat, mishmash, and knickknack, dilly-dally, etc. in English. On the one hand, such words form a regular phonological and regular functional pattern in English (they sound the same and have the same semantic connotations), but it is not productive: only one or two new words have been formed with this pattern in the last 100 hundred years in English. I argue that this pattern is therefore best analyzed in a construction-based approach, which has clear advantages over other approaches, e.g. analyses involving extra grammaticality or a synchronically productive reduplication process. Thus, words that consist of a single morpheme (like zigzag) can also be analyzed as constructions.